[an error occurred while processing the directive]

Xmr cryptocurrency calculator Архив

Bad crypto podcasrt contest

Автор: Mikale | Category: Xmr cryptocurrency calculator | Октябрь 2, 2012

bad crypto podcasrt contest

Today, Explained is Vox's daily news explainer podcast. El Salvador's bet on bitcoin Everything that could go wrong with the November election. On top of this, “mining difficulty” — a measure of computing power needed Bitcoin mining — hit a record high, indicating fierce competition that. Major cryptoasset exchange Binance is closer to finding out the identity the bad players, working with law enforcement around the globe. ETHEREUM HASHRATE RADEON 7950

May lead to home invasions, other kinds of things, very bad piece of information to have out there. Tim Ferriss: Rain down, meaning are suddenly searchable and available for consumption. Balaji Srinivasan: Suddenly searchable and available. Wikileaks style. But all kinds of social damage will be caused, low trust, relationships broken, all that type of stuff.

Like the tearing of the social fabric. Tim Ferriss: Well, I was just going to say, not to mention that even if you feel like you have nothing to hide, and this is an issue with a lot of surveillance act bills and things like that. If suddenly every lawmaker, every member of Congress has dirt on them, I mean, the destabilizing effect is non-trivial. Some people may make that argument, right? Balaji Srinivasan: Exactly. And if you look at what happened during the Sony hack and so on, this is like a preview of that.

And in fact, you have multiple earning names and multiple speaking games, just like you have multiple usernames at different sites. So one issue right now, just to frame the problem, is you may have a bunch of reputation followers or karma, for example, under a username, even a pseudonym. If you boot up another pseudonym, it starts at absolute zero, which is one of the big things that stops people from doing it.

And so someone who had 10, Karma under one pseudonym just like you use ZCash to transfer digital currency, ZCash was basically like the truly anonymous version of Bitcoin, the truly private version of Bitcoin. Just like you use ZCash to transfer cash from one name to another, you could use ZKarma to transfer Karma from one username to another and thereby a reboot under a new username.

Perhaps we should listen to what they have to say because they felt they had to go into a pseudonym for this. Like you may not even tell your wife. So essentially able to be considered a full pot. Corpse Husband. Ever heard of him? Balaji Srinivasan: Yeah, Corpse Husband. And that will be the equivalent of clothes. Tim Ferriss: All right. I had for context, as you mentioned, or maybe as I mentioned. You have certainly been a participant, and in some respects, by participating, a predictor of many developments in blockchain and cryptocurrency.

And for that reason, I had a laundry list of questions related to different types of possible predictions that you might have. Because I think by answering that, it might actually begin to speak to some of your predictions in the upcoming years. Should we think about that framing? So basically, I never give financial advice — Tim Ferriss: I was just going to say as a disclaimer, what would you do? This is not financial advice. Please continue.

How do I maximize returns? So the dumbest thing, but that I think is the most obvious thing to do, is put half into Bitcoin, half into Ether. Tim Ferriss: The dumbest, meaning the simplest or the most ill-advised? Balaji Srinivasan: No, the simplest.

The simplest thing that I think is guaranteed to produce really exceptional returns. Tim Ferriss: Is that what you would do now? Balaji Srinivasan: Right. So is the objective to make the maximum difference to humanity, or is it to maximize returns? Balaji Srinivasan: Oh, okay. Well, what I would do is something very different, so I thought you meant invest on behalf of somebody else. Tim Ferriss: Well, in a sense, you answered that.

Balaji Srinivasan: Sure, okay. So just to return to that, because we were talking about that at the beginning. This is going to be the first newsletter that pays you. Here is a scientific article, the best second video on this gets a thousand dollars that explains it to the masses. And the goal here in doing this is several fold. First is, I want to actually build up those citizen journalists that we talked about, those content creators. Second, I want to invest in a cumulative form of education, open source education where these folks are doing tutorials.

So for example, those 10 questions I just mentioned, it could be on science, but they could be on video editing or other kinds of things. How are those two things related? By the way, I know that seems a little vague, but let me explain. So you have these tasks that people are completing, and you have this educational content that people are creating. And so the educational tasks that I also pay people to do are like a curriculum that if you solve these tasks, you can level up and get higher value from remunerative tasks.

So the basic idea is — go ahead. Tim Ferriss: May I pause you for a second? So if you have a task like create 10 exercises based on this textbook or this material, can multiple people perform that or complete that task? If so, do you pay all of them? How do you decide who to pay? So the review process, actually, we allocate as much of a budget or a good chunk of the budget just to review because review is its own thing.

In a sense, this is like earn. And then Coinbase Earn was asset issuers, creators of new cryptocurrencies and digital assets would pay users to do tutorials on their asset to learn about how it worked, like Filecoin or Orchid, how to use decentralized storage or decentralized VPN. So just to summarize it again, A, a newsletter that pays you with at least a thousand dollars a day in Bitcoin prizes for completing tasks and tutorials.

And then B, what this does is hopefully, it bootstraps talent all over the world. We can give this skyhook to people and you can just start with nothing, absolutely nothing other than this phone, which people have made really cheap.

And you can do the tutorials, you learn some skills, you level up, you get more tasks, you start leveling up more, you get digital currency. And hopefully, this helps find also like the next Ramanujan out there.

So let me pause there. I would expect no less. What do you then do with that talent? So presumably, they develop some type of reputational score or they accrue some type of reputation. How do you airlift that kid out or encourage them to airlift themselves out? Is it the capital? Is it that they now have the resources and greater optionality to perhaps improve their situation? Or is there another approach because they could be brilliant and continue to complete these microtasks?

So three thoughts there. They can have home-cooked food, they can have their local culture and local language, but they can also get into the internet fast lane. And so the concept here is, yes, they would start earning. And the thing is a thousand bucks, even once in a year, is actually a lot of money for people in a lot of places.

And what does that mean in practice? This is actually the digital native solution to education. So you can think of a piece of paper, and then you can think of a scanner and then you can think of a text file. So you go from physical to this hybrid, like physical to digital scanner and then digital native. Zoom is also like a scanner. But then VR is like digital native. With me? Tim Ferriss: I am.

Balaji Srinivasan: Third example, physical cash, then something like PayPal or fintech, which is just basically the scanner, taking that and putting it online. So let me kind of motivate how that works and then you can see how maybe that links in with the tasking piece. Each course, roughly 10 weeks, and say on there you have 10 problems per week, sometimes more, sometimes less.

So that means about 2, problems, 25, times 10, times 10, you need to solve 2, problems before you get your one degree. And then you have one degree after problem 2,, a caricature but not by much. And after you have your one degree, you go and now you can actually get paid and you can work and so on and so forth. Now, of course, this is only an idealization, people will do paid internships and so on during college. So after problems, they have enough qualification to go and get some job or internship.

But to first order, this is how the system is still meant to work, get your diploma before you get a job. Now, one of the things people used to say, a sort of a caricature or attack or whatever of Udacity, Udacity had these nanodegrees. Well, you better expect a nanosalary. And so the idea here is that if you could show proof of skill somehow, if I could demonstrate that I have some skill in JavaScript, or I have some skill in chemistry or skill in Illustrator, whatever, then I could qualify for more skilled microtasks.

So the question then becomes, how do you actually do proof of skill? Balaji Srinivasan: Awesome. And now you can qualify for instant jobs, microtasks. And I know there are smart people there because I could see them in my class. We were going to build it on the Exercism framework. And exercism basically has something where you can learn Python by doing like 50 Python problems. So the deal behind Tim Ferriss: Already crazy.

Balaji Srinivasan: All right. So, so the third thing I was also thinking about is actually putting up a third kind of daily post, which is burning. Learning true things in leveling themselves up that way by gaining knowledge, health, like improving their body, their physique.

But also like staving off aging, thinking about transhumanism, measuring themselves, and then wealth as important, a third. Tim Ferriss: I love that. Now these are Google engineers, they make more than a few dollars a year, and it was incredibly effective.

I love that idea. Let me backstep if I could. And number two, and maybe you can answer this first, if you could paint a picture of what you consider the risk profile to be in doing something like that. But coming back up the stacks, so both of those things actually have common premises underneath them, which is that I am simultaneously very bearish on the US specifically in the West generally, but very bullish on the internet, technology, crypto, Asia, and future progress.

Often somebody is very positive on one, and positive in the other, or vice versa. Tim Ferriss: Why do they not? Why those things are bad for the East Coast establishment? But certainly Discord going and just shutting down GameStop discussion out of nowhere, based on, I think a pretext, seemed like someone pulled some strings somewhere to make that happen. It goes East Coast establishment, just to be clear, you mean specifically in the financial sector? And for many people, this is like this weird thing where, how is it that the US that they grew up in has suddenly just done a on this?

And the answer is that those folks have legacy distribution, but they have a terrible product. And crypto is actually truly free speech and free markets. Coming back up, you asked though why, why to win this game? Well they basically become these inbred folks.

They are not selecting on talent anymore. They are selecting on connections. Tim Ferriss: Just for sake of clarity, do you mean within corporate entities, therefore contrasting sort of — Balaji Srinivasan: East Coast media, for example, take a look at how many of those folks went to private school. How many of those folks have a trust fund? How many of those folks inherited a fortune?

Balaji Srinivasan: How does that tie? Those folks, they lack the skills to win in a fair competition. And in response to that, technologists developed Bitcoin and Ethereum and these free systems. Because I think one of the consequences here, or one of the medium term things is you can only use force to kind of clamp down on global free speech and free markets for so long.

One way I think about that is, after the financial crisis, basically, the way that they decided to like stop the next crisis is they made it almost impossible to get a banking charter. So you punish the banks by eliminating all of their competition.

Now, somehow fintech and crypto found a way, different threads coming to the same thing where basically like working above, doing partnerships, working below. Despite the front door being closed, technology came in through the windows, in the chimney or what have you. Dodd-Frank did not reform the banks, he just sort of enshrined them. It was a coronation in the name of a regulation. It did reduce some of their profit levels in some ways, but it made them look more invulnerable — go ahead.

I liked the coronation disguised as regulation. Balaji Srinivasan: Right, exactly. It is this universal acid. And the reason is because it connects people peer to peer. One of my laws of internet physics is the internet increases variance. First let me give the observation. The observation is you go from 30 minute sitcoms to 30 episode Netflix binges or 32 second YouTube clips.

You go from a taxi ride, standard taxi ride, to Uber, which actually has very long trips and also very short ones. The whole thing is spread out relative to the ride time of the normal taxi. Why does that happen? The internet, because it connects people peer to peer entities, peer to peer, it removes the middleman, it removes the mediator, it removes the moderator, it removes the mediocrity.

Now each of those words has a different connotation. So what happens is you have these communities that then arise with nodes that can never connect to each other, boom, they form some bizarre subreddit, right.

Tim Ferriss: I can finally say yes to something. Balaji Srinivasan: All right, great. So you centrifuge and you get these different layers out. Tim Ferriss: Samples of tissue or a fluid from my own body. Balaji Srinivasan: There you go.

There you go. So if you centrifuge something, you see all the layers, you can often see them just in the test tube itself. The one exception might be the Chinese Communist Party. That might be the exception that proves the rule, just because they were like super early on a lot of this, they built the firewall, they may be the exception that proves the rule and the future may be a centralized East versus decentralized West. Where, what would I think happens in the West, did you see this Greater Idaho thing, for example?

Tim Ferriss: Have I seen what? Balaji Srinivasan: Greater Idaho? So a bunch of counties in Oregon want to break away from Oregon and merge with Idaho. Catalonia wants to break away from Spain. Tim Ferriss: Quebec. There are quite a few examples. Balaji Srinivasan: Right, and the thing about that is I think some of those bad, some of that is good, but the centrifugal force, the whole thing is juddering, the system is juddering because folks are unhappy with it.

And I think one of the reasons for that is, going back to Westphalia, one of the Westphalian assumptions is that people who are geographically proximal are ideologically proximal. That, say, you live next door to this guy, therefore you share his language, you share his culture, you share the norms for the most part, you know them, you say hi to them, all the types of stuff, right. Balaji Srinivasan: Yes. Some of them will reform. And that makes people open to turning the constant to a variable.

A dollar sign, this fixed dollar that everybody knew into, well, like in a fiat or crypto. Something that was a constant is now a variable fiat or crypto. Before, it was just fiat. Was fiat even a word 10 years ago? People knew it. Tim Ferriss: I had never heard it. Balaji Srinivasan: You had never heard it, right?

It was a car. So essentially, many things we have taken to be constants have been turned into variables because there were constants due to that mediating influence. And once people could connect peer to peer on the internet, you could see there actually more permutations and more levels, and those people started to gain more of a voice.

And the top ones can now escape to build something better, which they did on the internet. And that I think becomes the new center that people align around, like the digital native kind of thing. You unbundle every single article, and website, and URL in the world and you rebundle them into a Twitter feed. The physical areas have less volition by their subjects. So they have to enact more coercion. And more coercion internally, leads to less solution and leads less legitimacy.

And so I wrote an article on this by the way, eight years ago in So I think that for BTC, because like a year-old protocol, the attack on BTC that I think would be the most likely is that the Chinese put up the great firewall against it. And so it assumes a global intranet.

I think at the end of the day, the firewall is pretty sophisticated. That plus domestic penalties may make it challenging for people to maintain a blockchain indefinitely in China, or what happens is they mine, the China chain and the rest of the world chain is also being mined.

And because the China chain would have more mining, the rest of the world chain would have less mining. That would be like the worst case scenario where, remember, two things would have to happen there. And second, they would have to allow Chinese mining to continue. Tim Ferriss: Sorry. I think what would happen is in the event that China allowed mining to continue, but put up the firewall, which is like the most Machiavellian thing they could do.

And the 30 percent that you assigned was only for the first part of that, correct? Not the allowing mining to continue. Balaji Srinivasan: Well, if they do both. If they do that and shut down mining, no problem. They have to either go overseas or pick up the phone and speak the words to somebody to execute a transaction. It is not the entity that we know from the movies, which maybe never existed. But the US government from , could do like Hoover Dam and a Manhattan Project and Apollo, that was like a generation that has long since gone.

Balaji Srinivasan: No. First, depending on how it manifests, people might actually move over to a quasi trusted chain for a time. But for example, ZCash could just double their supply from 21 million to 42 million and just give refuge to all Bitcoiners.

It just kind of snapshots at a particular timestamp. The same thing could happen with Ethereum, the same thing could happen and all these other chains. The sum total of all those values, that might be a price hit. Who the heck knows. I think any individual chain, it remains to be seen how robust they are. BitTorrent streaming is quite good. What was that? Popcorn Time? So on the US side, so now other algorithms, other consensus algorithms have a greater degree of partition tolerance built in, for example.

And a lot of smart computer scientists working on it. New York sort of overestimated their clout. What are you going to do? They were always hungry coming up, there were folks who understood, okay, New York has to do this, has to do that. This is something we have very low probability on. I think it can go many different ways. The future is uncertain. Or just a low consequence event because those companies domiciled in the US who are focused on crypto just redomiciled?

So I think US incorporation, in the sense of like being incorporated in the US, is going to be considered a major vulnerability in the future, I think, after the s. Local governments would actually adapt to the on-chain realities rather than vice versa. Now to the federal point, go ahead — Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I was just going to say that sounds like a company or organizational response to federal regulatory attack. Maybe Colorado, which will be sanctuary cities and states for crypto.

Tim Ferriss: Why is that? The whole Miami thing? So Miami suddenly basically began to — go ahead, I hear you laughing. It boggles the mind to me how that type of response is productive. Tim Ferriss: And then Elon moves to Austin and there you go. And this is the thing, so Suarez essentially has recruited all of these tech and finance people to Miami by literally just being friendly on Twitter and doing coffees with them, welcoming them to the city, billions of dollars in capital.

All of these companies have now moved to Miami because why would you — go ahead? The ROI of every tweet has to be a million dollars. His ROI is phenomenal. Because those folks will be these technologically progressive leaders that will recruit tech and finance to their cities. Chile for a while had a startup Chile program. Totally true. He got a bill through, which was like, well, Miami is now like a pro-Bitcoin city. He also put the Bitcoin white paper on miami.

What it does do is it puts up a flag. It has to actually get the nod from quite a few stakeholders in order for that to happen. So it may seem entirely or could be entirely symbolic if it were just an individual blogger but for it to be put on a website like that, it signifies much more. Quick question for you. So Wyoming also, by the way, has amazing crypto laws and basically my thesis on this, just to hover on that for a second, is those places will probably litigate and fight some federal kind of thing if it happens just because they have a strong incentive to all their citizens are there and so on and so forth.

Basically, ideologically, you made a bet against the monetary policy of the US. I actually want to make a contrarian — and, as it turns out, right — bet. And so those folks are not folks who are likely to just go down without a fight, the whole thing, I mean, these are activists. Tim Ferriss: And also highly anti-authoritarian, generally speaking. But capable of organizing. I mean, this is the best parts of the community. But I think it is fair to say that the best tech folks and the best crypto folks are win and help win, which is actually not neither progressive — Tim Ferriss: I agree.

Win and help win is neither progressive, nor conservative, nor libertarian, and let me explain why. Your progressive often has a very zero-sum mentality. And the libertarian will say live and let live, which is a vision of Little House on the Prairie, all being by themselves, et cetera.

But do that as well. Is there a list of what these different places are doing? Estonia, Dubai, et cetera, Miami or anything, a resource that one could point mayors and governors to who want to possibly look at testing different aspects of embracing Bitcoin or cryptocurrency? I want to see whether folks can crowdsource the rest.

And then we just put that into the website. And maybe we can just get that in a day. When we were discussing that earlier, what probability would you assign to the federal regulatory attack or shut down in the United States? And many of them are crypto-rich say of all the time in the world to be extremely online. So they punch massively above their weight. This is a non-answer, but let me give you something that I think is interesting.

And that was this enormous strengthening of the ranks that was able to make the argument that this was financial innovation. Because there was technical and monetary upside, not just an ideological project. That actually meant that the greatest support in some ways came from within the US, and in fact, places like China and Russia were actually more bearish on crypto and still are than the US is in many ways.

So it was like the regime and the opposition are both the strongest within. Tim Ferriss: I was just going to say it also strikes me that your vulnerability to regulatory shutdown also probably depends on the form in which you hold Bitcoin. Balaji Srinivasan: Oh, yeah. You definitely want to hold your keys locally. Get your keys off exchanges, do it now, do it yesterday, get your coins off exchanges. Not your keys, not your coins, absolutely percent true. Just to make sure that we touch this base, is the risk profile of Ethereum different?

Is it more resilient and less susceptible to certain risks? Is it more susceptible? How would you think about Ethereum as compared to Bitcoin from that perspective? Balaji Srinivasan: Yeah, so it has a different pattern of risks. Some of them are shared like regulatory attacks on crypto. Others are distinct. So it has a different, orthogonal set of risk factors.

I think Ethereum is certainly more complicated than Bitcoin in many ways. All the smart contracts. And it does have actually a negative network effect right now where the more things that run on it, the higher the fees are, which crowd out other things. It may turn out, for example, with Ethereum, that only the prices to applications stay in Ethereum and many other applications go to other L1 chains that then all just specialize by application.

And so on and so forth. And chain interoperability, a so-called interchain, will be a big thing. So Bitcoin had no knowledge of other chains, but nowadays chains do have knowledge of other chains through things like crypto oracles, things outside of themselves. So risk factors of Ethereum are distinct, different from those of Bitcoin. Some overlapping, some not. In my mind, at least. There are those out there who are terrified of your predictions because they feel, rightly or wrongly, and I want to hear your perspective on this, that there is a high likelihood baked into those predictions of apocalyptic outcomes and that one needs to become a tech-enabled Jason Bourne to survive, let alone thrive in the future.

Balaji Srinivasan: Which is you, Tim! But go ahead. Tim Ferriss: So how would you respond to that assessment? And is that just a misread of you in general? Balaji Srinivasan: I think the future will be more different from the present than is commonly understood.

So more different than ours, was the year that different from ? Not really. Certainly there were political changes and obviously China had reformed and the SSR had fallen and so forth. But the rhythms of daily life are actually quite similar.

You know? They were still basically landlines. Handsets, right? Cordless, perhaps. One way of thinking about that is, what was your daily life when you woke up in ? And almost every aspect of that is now changed. How do you wake up? You wake up to your phone, right? Messages are coming into you, right? You have this personal communication device. The first thing you do is different.

This is for people who are addicted to their phone, but a lot of people are. So you look at that, right? Because your sleep was also instrumented. And you just work remote from your pajamas in the living room, which is totally feasible today. Your job is just much more variable than the hammering job.

Basically every single second of life, from your sleep to your sleep tracker, to your food, through your ordering apps, or what have you, to obviously your work to your finances, to your communications, to where you decide to go after you finish working.

Getting lost was a thing. We never get lost anymore, not in the same way. And so for the most part, thoroughfares were really important. It was like the fewest number of turns. The map was mostly corridored. Your recreational life, you can meet with a different person 50 days out of the week rather than the same group of friends. It messes up your teeth and so on.

And in many ways what I think, and this is not original to me by any means, this is a fusion. The best quality of life will actually be available to the digital nomad who has a minimum number of possessions, has the ability to pick up and move stakes at any point, because mobility is leveraged against a state. A state is a sessile actor. Mobility is something that you can do as an individual, the state cannot do.

Not as easily. And so new kinds of polities will form. New ways of self-governing humans that are fundamentally network-based, rather than state-based. Fundamentally optimized for mobile social networks, as opposed to stationary houses. Because the assumptions are fundamentally different. And, basically, for example, I define a network state as a social network with an integrated cryptocurrency in a sense of national consciousness that eventually crowdfunds territory. It can be a cul-de-sac here, a ranch here, an apartment building here.

And so you have a group of a hundred thousand people that owns pieces of territory all around the world and that is constantly in communication with each other through a social network and considers themselves to be a people. This is a network state. And it is like a cloud formation taking physical shape.

The clouds are actually distilling down. And so, when I think about the future, I think about this type of stuff. This is going down, this is going up, this is going down, this is going up. Tinder alone is a complete change in our mating habits. Swipe right, swipe left, swipe right, swipe left. Have you seen the graph of how people meet their partners? Tim Ferriss: I have not. This is an amazing graph of how people meet their significant other, the update.

Basically, each little curve here tells a story, but it was like, did you meet at church? Did you meet through your parents? You meet at college? Did you meet at work? And you can see meet at work is this boomlet that kind of drops off. And so what dominates everything today is internet.

Internet, internet. So Tinder alone is just this massive evolution. And then you have 20 of them happening at the same time. And so all of those are these things where the institutions that we have are simply not built for this at all. Not so much that you view humans, or the future of humans, through a dystopian or pessimistic lens.

Is that fair to say? So, what is a positive vision? What do I think about? Prev Next 1 of 4. For example, there are episodes on the principles of cryptography, and an in-depth look at Ethereum from a developer point of view. You can subscribe to the newsletter to get updates on new episodes and the podcast is completely free—although donations are accepted.

McCormack has one of the most interesting stories of anyone in Crypto. Just note, I am not bitter or salty in any way at all, the last 2 years have been an amazing ride — travelled the world, been wealthy, been poor. Keith Wareing Keith Wareing is a one-man-brand in himself. As controversial as they come, Keith almost always holds the opposite point of you from others in the industry. Wrapping It Up There are now hundreds of excellent podcasts and other material out there.

If you want to hear from industry leaders and movers and shakers, Bad Crypto is a good place to start. And if you want to learn more about Betfair Trading and cryptocurrency in general, ReadySet Crypto is a great bet. Enjoy the ride! In Q1, Q2 and Q3 of TradeHost is busier than ever and even more profitable with a whopping 16, Betfair markets traded. All results for the 24, Betfair markets traded are here.

Top 50 Comments on JuiceStorm. Your Betfair Trading mindset is your most important asset. Betfair Trading is hard. Developing skills as patience, discipline and confidence takes time and dedication. But once you do that, they will stay with you forever. Keep going.

Bad crypto podcasrt contest better investing stock market or real estate bad crypto podcasrt contest


Don't take anything we say as gospel. Do not come to our homes with pitchforks because you lost money by listening to us. We only share with you what we are learning and what we are investing it. We will never "pump or dump" any cryptocurrencies. Take what we say with a grain of salt. You must research this stuff on your own! Initially intended as a joke memecoin, Doge has taken on a life of its own.

Doge culture is very real, with many people using Dogecoin as a currency for buying, selling, donating and tipping. May I have another? Do you not like putting ICOs on there? When you were evaluating the exchange space in , what made you say this was missing from the market and this is where you were going to focus your efforts?

How do you manage the regulations in those different countries? What do you think is going to be the watershed moment for crypto? Explanation of the use of the native BNB coin. How does it work with the centralized exchange? Do you really think it would have sold out in under a minute? We are sharing our journey with you as we learn more about this crazy little thing called cryptocurrency.

Bad crypto podcasrt contest panbet betting shops cyprus

🐳💩Whales Dumping Crypto? Bad News For October 21, 2022

All became forex magnates london sorry


Don't take anything we say as gospel. Do not come to our homes with pitchforks because you lost money by listening to us. We only share with you what we are learning and what we are investing it. We will never "pump or dump" any cryptocurrencies.

Take what we say with a grain of salt. You must research this stuff on your own! Initially intended as a joke memecoin, Doge has taken on a life of its own. Doge culture is very real, with many people using Dogecoin as a currency for buying, selling, donating and tipping. When you were evaluating the exchange space in , what made you say this was missing from the market and this is where you were going to focus your efforts?

How do you manage the regulations in those different countries? What do you think is going to be the watershed moment for crypto? Explanation of the use of the native BNB coin. How does it work with the centralized exchange? Do you really think it would have sold out in under a minute? We are sharing our journey with you as we learn more about this crazy little thing called cryptocurrency. Don't take anything we say as gospel.

Do not come to our homes with pitchforks because you lost money by listening to us.

Bad crypto podcasrt contest better place copenhagen denmark

Rich Dad Author Says US Dollar is “Toast” - Bad News For October 24, 2022

Other materials on the topic

  • Scrufizzer better place instrumental beats
  • Lay betting losers
  • Multiterminal forex4you mt4
  • Cryptocurrency investment im only 25
  • Martingale betting system flaws quotes
  • Об авторе


    1. Kazralkis

      burton albion vs blackpool betting expert soccer

    [an error occurred while processing the directive]